Since Sizzle will be just one of them, thanks to our natural behavior ( read: re-create the wheel ) it is possible that there will be more selector engines around the net.
So, why we could not create our own library that does just what we need and nothing else, maintaining a decent size and performing like a jaguar :D ???
Here a truly basic example about how to create your own library, basing it over a generic selector engine or generic library (or just its engine, if you prefer one)
// our wonderful library constructor
function myQuery(){
// just in case we prefer another name for the constructor
// this code is "name proof"
var callee = arguments.callee;
return this instanceof callee ?
this :
callee.prototype.init.apply(new callee, arguments)
;
};
// add some native prototype to created array like instances
// a common pattern for DOM based libraries
with(Array.prototype)
myQuery.prototype = {
constructor:myQuery,
length:0,
pop:pop,
push:push,
shift:shift,
slice:slice,
sort:sort,
splice:splice,
unshift:unshift
};
// add "not standard yet array prototypes", if necessary, or our own cool proottypes
myQuery.prototype.forEach = Array.prototype.forEach || function(Function, self){
for(var i = 0, length = this.length; i < length; i++)
(i in this) && Function.call(self, this[i], i, this);
};
// define the init prototype to use the pre defined engine
myQuery.prototype.init = function(){
var self = this.engine.apply(null, arguments);
this.push.apply(this, self instanceof Array ? self : this.slice.call(self, 0));
return this;
};
// define the engine for this library
myQuery.prototype.engine = Sizzle; // or jQuery
onload = function(){
// enjoy your lib
myQuery(".foo .bar").forEach(function(HTMLElement){
HTMLElement.innerHTML = "Hello Lib!";
});
};
Summary
The main limit is the engine itself, or better, arguments that the engin could accept.
If we change engine and this accepts different arguments or same arguments in a different way, we need to change every call to our library but at least everything else will work without problems.
For this reason it is reasonble to choose a common engine arguments model, like Sizzle, for example, presuming other engine will accept the same list of options and will produce an array like result.
Am I suggesting to avoid famous/common library? Absolutely no, I simply think the selector engine is the most important thing for whatever DOM purpose library :-)
No comments:
Post a Comment